Jumat, 31 Desember 2010

From Korea

Korean adoptee … learns Korean! Part 2

Last time I wrote, I said that I would write next about “How I ignored my emotions and oppression long enough to learn some grammar.”

Fugitive Visions is a lot about my very real emotional struggle for the first years coming to Korea and how that has intersected with my engagement or lack thereof with the Korean language, and how painful and rotten that was for a long time. I’m not going to barf my guts out and write that all over again here, so I’m going to just talk about some things here that are working for me now or that worked well for me in the past. I don’t think that I have by any means gotten it all figured out, and there are adoptees I have met whose Korean is far, far better than mine. I am also in the lucky position of having a good relationship with my Korean family, and never having had to search for them because they found me first. I honestly cannot imagine how difficult it must be to embark on the Korean language learning process if you have not been reunited. Adoptees do it, and I salute them! I really don’t know how they can, but they do. Anyway, in my particular situation, I’ve figured out some things that work for me, and you can take what’s useful to you and leave the rest.

1. Ignore people who interrupt your learning

As an adoptee living in Korea, various situations have come up time and time again with

–white people who speak better Korean than me (nothing like that to make an adoptee clam up in a hurry);

–people who use adoption as a metaphor for their own experience but who have no concrete understanding of adoption as a reality (I had that one today: ”It’s like I was adopted.” Yeah right. Ha.);

–Korean people insisting on my foreignness or Koreanness and not just letting me be an internationally adopted Korean (“When are you going back to CHINA?” “You have Korean blood — you should be able to learn Korean fast!”);

–people telling me what I am or what my experience has been and then asking for confirmation later, (“Well you’re American … aren’t you?”) etc.

Hurtful conversations have hurt my language learning in the past because my learning would be interrupted by my anger at people’s ignorance and wrong assumptions, my jealousy at those white guys who speak great Korean because they are married to Korean women while people look at adoptees like “What the hell is wrong with you?” or just my overwhelming sadness about not being able to communicate with my own family in a meaningful way — to talk about our experiences, our feelings, our disappointments and our dreams together. When the use of the phone is a anxiety-provoking event (“Sis!! SLOW DOWN!” “Big brother, your accent is crazy!! I can’t understand a word you’re saying!”), then it means you generally don’t use the phone and even though your family is so close, you are still so far …. How screwed up is that?

Well, I still have the phone frustration (though it’s getting better), but one of the keys that I’ve figured out is just to IGNORE OTHER PEOPLE. Really. Could it be that simple? It is hard to ignore people when they get under your skin, but if you let them get to you, then you waste a lot of time. Wow, I have wasted a lot of time! There are always going to be annoying jerks in your class or your program, so since you can’t get rid of them and you definitely don’t want to be friends with them, you might as well just ignore them.

1a. Exception: You cannot ignore your Korean language teacher.

Korean language teachers can be just as ignorant about what an adoptee is as anyone else, and can proceed to say whack things about adoptees or adoption treat you in a way you don’t like in class without knowing that they just made you space out of class for the next 45 minutes while you try to hold back tears or anger. I have unsuccessfully tried to challenge teachers when this has happened to me before, but last semester I was so proud of myself and felt very empowered because I talked with a teacher THREE TIMES and then she finally got it. I guess when you are presented with any new, awkward situation, you have to have some practice at it.

Also, those textbooks are all written for foreigner-foreigners, not adoptees. Especially adoptees who are reunited need to learn certain things like family words and casual language first, not after all the formal language and chatting about the weather as the books teach. So this is a difficult point, and maybe if I master the language one day, I’ll write my own little slim book for adoptees with all that family stuff that we need to know right off the bat. I’m in Level 4 now and there is STILL a lot of language that I’ve just picked up by myself that has never appeared in the book because I am interacting within a Korean family.

2. Have an emotionless stock phrase that you can say in Korean to explain your existence to get people off your back if you want, or to open up conversation further.

I struggled for a long time with my limited Korean trying to figure out how to give Koreans I encountered in everyday life the information they want (to get them off my back) in a way that was also dignified to me. Now I can spit out my phrase quickly and like a robot and decide, depending on how they respond, whether I want to continue the conversation. I often do because I want to ask them questions about what they think about adoption, etc., and because they usually seem like good people who are just curious, and whose cultural idea of privacy … well, they don’t really have one. Usually I encounter people whose services I need in daily life: the beauty shop lady, the taxi driver, the shoeshine guy, etc. They are all free language tutors. And each time I decide that I want to engage, I have a chance to share ideas with another person.

3. Play mind games with yourself if you need to.

I don’t need to do this anymore, but I used to pretend I was white to get through the learning, since it seems so easy for white people to study Korean as a hobby. (A hobby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IMAGINE THAT!!!!!!!!!!!) I want it to be easy for me too. So you know, for an adoptee raised in rural Minnesota, pretending you’re white is not really a big stretch.

4. No drama, no drama, no drama

This one is hard, but I can really say that since I have taken some steps to decrease the drama in my life, the learning and productivity have increased significantly.

5. Talk to supportive adoptees who are studying well

I met a cute little someone who had taken Korean classes for years growing up, and she tested in at Level 4 when she went to the Inje program six years ago. I was so impressed with her that I decided to make my goal Level 4, and happily, I’ve achieved that goal finally this semester! I remember what she said when I complimented her on her Korean, while I was feeling so inadequate. She said:

“Everyone’s Korean sucks. Some people’s Korean just sucks less.”

Another adoptee I met, who has been in Korea for years, speaks pretty great Korean — enough to translate for other adoptees. I asked him what his secret was, and he said:

“Don’t compare yourself to other people in your class. Even if you have to repeat a level, as long as you’ve improved, you’re doing OK.”

Another adoptee who does not live in Korea at all, but who confidently put on her attitude and went to Yongsan with no Korean language skills at all and helped an adoptee who actually lives here purchase a computer, put it like this:

“People who make their living by selling things want to sell things to you. So they make it easy for you.”

Another adoptee who studied her face off for years and who would not come out to play with me often, but in exchange is now very comfortable speaking Korean, told me:

“You just have to decide that you can do it.”

Continuing READING AT JANE"S BLOG

Not all Gay for Celebs ' Adoption'

Gay and adopted Daily Mail columnist slams Sir Elton’s decision to have a baby

Andrew Pierce is an editor for the Daily Mail
Andrew Pierce, the consultant editor of the Daily Mail had penned a column criticising the decision of Sir Elton John and David Furnish to have a surrogate baby, despite being both gay and adopted himself.

Mr Pierce wrote: “I have no doubt of the couple’s ‘over whelming’ happiness and joy at the arrival of their son. I am quite certain that the child’s unorthodox parentage — he was born to an unidentified surrogate mother who had carried the child after being implanted with a donor egg from another mystery woman — will prove no barrier to the love the couple will lavish on him.

“Yet I can’t help feeling that his decision to become a father is another grotesque act of selfishness from Sir Elton, and that the child is a little Christmas bauble he and his partner have awarded themselves. How telling it is that he was born on Christmas Day.”

Mr Pierce in a sense echoes the sentiments of Christian fundamentalist Stephen Green who told the BBC that Sir Elton’s child is a “designer accessory” for the popstar.
However, unlike Mr Green, Mr Pierce does believe that gays couples should be allowed to adopt. He wrote: “I have two very good male friends who are in a civil partnership and have adopted a little girl. They will make wonderful parents not least because they are absolutely committed to each other, but also because one of them has given up his job to be a full-time parent.”

Mr Pierce points out that in almost ten years ago, Sir Elton argued that he was too old to be a parent, telling Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet: “I have come to the conclusion that it is too late for me. Had it been 20 years ago, then I would definitely have done it. I don’t want to be 70 years old when my daughter turns 16.”

In reality Sir Elton will be 79 when his son turns 16.
Mr Pierce argues that Sir Elton wouldn’t have been allowed to adopt a child due to his age, so paid to create his own.

“He [Sir Elton] is also an ageing, pampered, self-indulgent millionaire — look at the absurd names he and Furnish have given the poor child, for heaven’s sake!

“And it is the nagging suspicion that Elton — a man who is by nature an obsessive — has simply acquired a son to satisfy his latest fixation that I find repellent.”

Mr Pierce touched on his own personal story, writing: “as an adopted gay man, I have no interest in having children of my own — although I don’t denigrate those who want to.
“Let’s hope Elton John’s son gets the same chances that I had, which had nothing to do with money. My parents had little of that.

“What they offered instead was the love and support of an ordinary, hard-working couple who were always there for their children. How often will Sir Elton be there for his son?”

Kamis, 30 Desember 2010

No money to adopt ? Dont worry the financial industry provides

Funding The Baby Adoption Process

A baby adoption is not an inexpensive process. Many hopeful parents discard the idea of a baby adoption early because they do not realize that there are both private and government resources that are available to help prospective adoptive parents, which will aid in the costs associated with travel, agency fees and additional spending.

There are several tax benefits associated with baby adoption, which include the Federal Adoption Tax Credit. This amount is a credit issued for adoptive families on qualified expenses related to a baby adoption. Allowable expenses, in this case, are subtracted from the current tax liability. In addition, a number of states offer a tax credit in addition to the previously mentioned federal tax credit. When it comes to taxes, adoptive parents are allowed to claim the same dependency exemption as for their biological children. This exemption provides a reduction in taxable income.

In addition to tax assistance, a number of employers participate in the Adoption Assistance Benefits Program. This program allows employers to reimburse a baby adoption with a cash benefit. If your employer does not participate in this program, you may request material to provide your employer in an effort to request adoption assistance by contacting the National Adoption Center.

Both federal employees and military personnel are eligible for baby adoption benefits, which vary from extended leaves and/or reimbursement of up to $2,000.00 after the baby adoption is finalized.

Employees of Harvard University are also eligible for baby adoption assistance directly from the Harvard Adoption Assistance Plan. Under this program, up to $5,000.00 may be granted for expenses relating to the adoption of a child with financial need not being a factor.

In addition to these options, there are grants specifically designed to help prospective parents with expenses relating to the adoption. These include A Child Waits Foundation, Hebrew Free Loan Association, Funds 4 Families, A Mothers Love Fundraising, Community Fundraisers, The National Adoption Foundation, Ours By Grace and United Way International.

As a final option in assistance with funding a baby adoption, individuals may consult with their local bank or credit union regarding loan programs for adoptive families. Others may choose to use their savings account or cash out the equity in their home to make an adoption happen. If you ask most adoptive parents, money is no object when it comes to the love of a child and the joy that he/she brings into the life of loving parents.

Funding The Baby Adoption Process

Sale of Children for adoption in India continues

Serious adoption issues came to the fore in Pune

Published: Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010, 11:02 IST
By Bhagyashree Kulthe | Place: Pune | Agency: DNA

The illegal trafficking of children for adoption came to light in June this year with the arrest of the head of Gurukul Godavari Balak Ashram for illegal sale of a HIV-positive child to a childless couple.

Irregularities in the adoption process took centrestage with the arrest of the head of Preet Mandir adoption agency for alleged involvement in wrong adoption practices in August.

The incidents put all the adoption agencies and orphanages in the city under the scanner, raising questions about the role of women
and child development commissionerate, with its
headquarter in Pune.

The Yerawada police arrested Mathew Rayappa Yanmal (49), head of Gurukul Godavari Balak Ashram, on June 2 for selling an infant to a couple in Mumbai for Rs1 lakh.

The couple had lodged a complaint after the baby died. Yanmal had concealed the fact that the child was HIV-positive. He obtained a fake birth certificate of the deceased child with the help of headmaster of Namdeo Harpale Anusuchit Jati Jamati Primary and Secondary School, Somnath Bhimrao Shinde (43) of Phursungi.

Yanmal was later charged for taking another child born out of wedlock into custody illegally. The arrest of his accomplice, Shivaji Cholappa Sanake, the sacked caretaker of Preet Mandir, further complicated the matter.

Another major development was the arrest of 71-year-old Joginder Singh Bhasin, the founder of Preet Mandir, one of the biggest adoption agencies in the city, for illegal adoption practices on August 10.

The petitions filed in the Bombay high court by city-based NGOs, Advait Foundation and Sakhee, in 2006 and 2007 put the agency in the eye of the storm.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probed the matter twice and gave a clean chit. The Central Adoption Resource Agency (Cara), the apex body in adoption, too said that no irregularities were found in the Preet Mandir case.

In May 2010, the CBI accepted there were irregularities and that government officials too were involved. They registered a case leading to Bhasin’s arrest.

He was released on bail on August 17. However, the agency succeeded in bringing a stay on the transfer of children from the two units of Preet Mandir.

The developments kept the women and child development staff and the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) on their toes while their ineffectiveness in controlling the adoption racket came to the fore.

Despite many illegal orphanages flourishing in the city, the department had not registered a single case over the last year. Even the Gurukul Godavari Balak Ashram was unregistered and no action had been taken.

The development also revealed that the tendency of childless couples to hide the fact of adoption, the high demand for infants and the long procedural wait for adoptive parents was driving the illegal racket.

Another adoption case that made headlines was that of an India-born German national, Arun Dhole, who was adopted from the city-based Kusumbai Motichand Mahila Seva Gram. His 17-year-old legal battle to know about his biological mother came to an end when the Supreme Court allowed him to see the records of the adoption agency.


Selasa, 28 Desember 2010

Rights for Adoptees neglected

End a hidden legacy of shame, fear and venality

27-12-2010

Bastard Nation Letter to NJ Gov. Chris Christie - Please Veto S799/A1399

I'll be blogging on the current situation in New Jersey in a couple days, as well as posting a Bastard Nation Action alert regarding S799/A1399. In the meantime, here is the letter BN sent to Gov. Chris Christie asking him to veto the bill if it's hits his desk.

Governor Chris Christie
Office of the Governor
PO Box 001
Trenton, NJ 08625

PLEASE VETO S799/A1399: the Adoptees' Birthright Bill

Dear Governor Christie:

Bastard Nation: the Adoptee Rights Organization, the largest adoptee civil rights organization in North America, opposes S799/A1399: The Adoptees' Birthright bill. We ask you to veto it if it comes to your desk. The bill is currently awaiting a vote on the House Floor on January 6 or 20, 2011.

If passed, this bill will permit some of New Jersey's adopted adults to receive their true and accurate original birth certificates. Others, through the compromise language of this bill, will receive only a false and mutilated certificate with the name and address of the parent(s) bureaucratically excised by the Department of Health and Senior Services by order of the birthparent(s).

Bastard Nation rejects this newly created special right of birthparents to remove their names from the birth certificates--the public record-- of their own adult offspring. No other parent has that right. Why should birthparents have different rules?

Since 1999 four states have restored to adoptees the unrestricted right to records and identity access: Oregon through ballot initiative, and Alabama. New Hampshire, and Maine through legislation. Kansas and Alaska never sealed records. New Jersey should not buck the tide. New Jersey should not pass a bill that continues to treat adoptee access to their own birth certificates as a favor, not a right--a right that the not-adopted enjoy without a second thought.

S799/A1399 is not an Adoptees' Birthright bill. It does not restore the right of unrestricted birth certificate access to New Jersey's adoptees. Instead it encodes "special rights" for some into state law where it did not exist before. Please veto this discriminatory legislation.

For the record, Bastard Nation also opposes an alternate bill (no number assigned as of this writing) introduced in the House and supported by the New Jersey ACLU, New Jersey Right to Life and other organizations opposed to the restoration of adoptee rights, which offers a favor-based system of birth certificate access.

Yours truly,

Marley Greiner
Executive Chair
Bastard Nation: the Adoptee Rights Organization

Senin, 27 Desember 2010

Hague Convention Member Denies Access to important right of Adoptees

One Page Argument for Communication with Legislators
  • Adoptees are the only citizens who do not have access to their original birth certificates. This is unequal treatment under the law.
  • Birth parents had no legal promise of anonymity. The files were sealed upon adoption not relinquishment, and adoptees could always petition a court to open them. Also adopting parents could choose not to amend and seal the birth certificate, therefore according to the statute the birth parent never controlled release of her or his identity. RCW 26.33.330;RCW 70.58.230; 26.33.
  • Birth parents will be able to file a form to indicate their preference for or against contact. They will also be able to fill out a medical history form, both of which will be filed with the original birth certificate.
  • No reports of Contact Preference form violations have been filed in other jurisdictions and less than 1 percent of birth parents have requested no contact. For the Records II, Evan B. Donalson Adoption Institute

History: Prior to 1943, Washington adoptees had access to their original birth certificates and adoption records. The records were sealed due to concern for the social stigma of adoption with respect to adoptee and birth mother; the psychological concept that a baby was a blank slate; and the theory that both mother and baby would be able to sever the tie without negative consequences. This theory has since been proven false. Mothers did not easily recover from the loss of their relinquished children and babies were also affected by the loss of both their original families and their identity information. Though a sealed identity might be necessary in some cases while adoptees are children, there is no excuse for a state to deny access to one’s own birth documents from an adult, merely based on the way they entered their family.

Lori Jeske says:

Based on WA-CARE recent and on-going interaction with various WA State Legislators…can the group create a page on this blog site that lists where each of our legislative representatives stand on the issue? I’ve discovered through my own personal interactions that the majority of legislators do not want to take a stand one way or the other.

We all know WA State Senator Jim Hargrove (D) 24th Legislative District has publicly and specifically stated on record that he is biased on the issue and he is the Chair of the Senate Human Services and Corrections Committee where any bill related to adoptee rights will not see another hearing.

I’m under the distinct impression that Washington State will remain an adoptee-rights segregated state until we either change who legislatively represents citizens or we run an initiative process through the state and let voters decide.


Minggu, 26 Desember 2010

PPL Author Kerry analyses the (Adoption) Christmas story

Christmas, and a story of adoption (revisited)

Sat, 2010-12-25 15:51 - Kerry

Recently, I revisited the story of the Dead Baby Scam.... it's part of adoption history that few may know about... a practice that has made many a doctor/lawyer more wealthy and it was a practice used to assist infertile couples wishing their suffering for a child would end. Yes, Virginia, there is a very merry happy ending in many an infant adoption story. (I'll reserve my praise to God, my thanks to Mary, my appreciation for Joseph and all an adoptive father can do to and for his adopted child(ren), for a later time.)

I sit at my computer on the day many of us in America celebrate Christmas... the increasingly commercial ritual-tradition that celebrates the birth of baby Jesus, and family. We're to believe Mary got pregnant through immaculate conception. Even as a child, 'immaculate conception' was a difficult story to believe. I wanted to believe what the priests in my church were telling me. I wanted to trust what it was the nuns/lay people in my school were teaching me, but I have to admit, I always was a very stubborn girl who just so happened to have been adopted into a large, traditional Catholic family. You see, in my mind, it was God who came, gave Mary His child, then went --leaving mom-to-be and unborn baby on their own, (thank you).

As luck/fate would have it, this father-leaving sequence is a common theme seen through-out the history of child placement. Why, just the other day I read a piece about Australian/adoption... a modern-day piece that tells an old story about young, scared, (unwed) pregnant women, and the struggles (and suffering) they went through before, during, and after birth. I encourage people, regardless of religious beliefs and convictions, to read the story, 'Your son is gone. He's with his adoptive parents'. It was written by Marissa Calligeros and posted in the Brisbane Times. It begins:

"The room was blacked out. There were no windows and just one door.

"They tied my hands and feet to the bed. I was in agony. I was screaming out in pain.

"Then there was silence.

"No one would have known a baby had been born. But I did."

The story of a baby's birth adoption continues, painting a picture for all to visualize as they read. "The young women were drugged, tethered to beds, and never allowed to see their babies". The author used the phrase 'baby farm' to describe the way women and babies were treated by various God-fearing religious folk, doing charity work for the good of society, and of course, the poor. [For more on the historical treatment of poor, unmarried, pregnant women, please read Bastardy and Baby Farms]

True, some mothers of that era did finally meet the child they had lost. Maybe the child was raised in the same town, the same country. Hell, let's try to assume that baby was kept on the same continent. If that child was lucky, that child was loved, cared for, and not harmed by enemies or strangers. Unfortunately, in many cases, those out-sourced babies were eventually called "orphans" and used as slaves, and re-named child migrants. Imagine being the mother who wanted so much more for herself and her baby... imagine going to your grave never knowing what happened to the live-baby you know you birthed... the baby God had once given... the baby that was taken away, and sent or sold to complete strangers because you were deemed 'unworthy', 'not good enough', and 'unfit'. God forbid the unworthy "sinner" be given assistance.

I'd like to revisit an original story of Christmas, family, and adoption, as it was written by Elizabeth Foss . She wrote:

A strong man heard the call of a God to take into his heart and home a baby that was not his biological child. Against the raised eyebrows of those around him, but because he dearly loved his wife and the God they served

As I always understood the leading events to the Christmas story, Joseph had to be convinced - by an angel- to marry the already knocked-up Mary. See, Mary was used by God knows who, soiling her good reputation and rendering her unfit virgin-bride material. So, in essence, an angel had to make Joseph believe God wanted him to make Mary his legal wife, because it was the right God-pleasing thing to do. After all, how in the world would Mary, and her bastard baby, Jesus, have been received by local society? [And surely, there would be a future-reward after X amount of years of devoted service....] Nevertheless, in Foss' story of adoption, she continues to explain how a woman's pain can inspire others into action. She writes:

Adoptive moms assure me that adoption is rarely ever a man's idea. And it is almost always an idea born of a woman's pain. The sorrowful heart of a mother meets the sorrowful heart of a child and together they begin a new life. But how do they get to "together?" They become a family through the courageous actions of a man who sees the pain of his wife and listens to her as she tells him about the pain of the child. Rarely, do these women beg and plead. Rather, like Mary, they trust God. They pour out their hearts in prayer and God convicts their husbands. The program director for a Catholic adoption agency assures me that this is not the case of weak, badgered men who cave to whining women. Rather, they are tender, brave men who recognize a mutual need and hear a distinct call.

Tender brave men, catering to the needs of women and children. That's how an adoption director describes Adoptive Fathers. Sure, ok. I too would like to believe an adoptive parent would never hurt a child put in his/her care. Here's the bad news for an adoption agency: Had the father of Mary's baby stayed, or had Mary's own family helped her somehow, maybe an AP like tender, brave Joseph would not have been called and summoned to help raise and teach and financially support Jesus for 12 years.

So let's look at the role of sorrowful mother-wanna-bes in Adoptionland. Over and over again, I read pieces written by, and for, the infertile. In fact, just today, this little piece came in: Grieving the loss of two babies, Midway couple find joy in adoption. Yes, just like the perfect Christmas miracle, a prayerful couple got the call the call they were waiting for...(feel free to go read the details). Of course, if there isn't a small local news article, or an updated blog post for the faithful (but-still-unable to conceive) to read, those who still need reason to hope for a baby can always turn to the ad-filled, pages at Adopion.con. [As the side-bar menu on each page indicates, the religious-faith separation is done for you.] I supposed stories of infant adoption are supposed to encourage others to seek places like Gladney or Bethany, two agencies with great success-numbers and nice six-figure non-profit salaries, to boot. [BTW, Bethany has yet to claim it's 2009 Demons in Adoption Award....]

Sure, gone are the days of barbaric treatment in highly successful Maternity Homes. The tethers and drugs have been replaced with temporary housing, shopping sprees, and promises of a much better future. Hell, at some modern-day maternity homes, an in-ground pool is even available to help relax the confined and unmarried-in-waiting. Let us not forget the simple fact that remains the same and unchanged: maternity homes and affiliated adoption agencies work hard to ease the pain felt by a woman's need.

As more and more people, are being encouraged to consider the adoption-option, as more and more singles or couples are very anxiously waiting for the gift of life they paid-for, (and are still expecting to receive), as more and more people choose to go into the private adoption agency business, and as rules related to sexual activity/history are becoming more lenient, one ought to question if infant adoption, as it has always has and continues to be practiced, is indeed,God's Plan. (I for one am hoping God is getting really royally pissed how modern-day 'widows' and 'orphans' are being created and treated by those profiting within the adoption industry.)

Personally, I believe in most cases, infant adoption is little more than a practice that puts selfish desires first. Infant adoption, as a niche, allows far too many greedy self-serving individuals to play God, lie and cheat, and then claim it's all good, because it's done with God's help and in Jesus' name. Yes, I speak, write and think as an adoptee, relinquished at birth... then sold to foreigners who should not have turned to an adoption agency because the still-suffering wife had a hysterectomy.

With that, in the spirit of an angry adoptee, I'd like readers to see the latest abused adoptee case-story that made PPL pages. Published Dec 22, 2010.... Four girls adopted by Henrique Cruz, were sexually abused for more than six years, (before they were all 14), by their home-studied adoptive father.

The Cruz couple adopted the four girls, who were blood sisters, and their little brother, but it was unknown if the children were adopted from the foster care system.

Paul Zimmerman, regional spokesman for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, said the process to adopt a child from foster care in Texas comes with extensive background checks.

“It’s a pretty extensive process when it comes to screening,” he said.

Zimmerman noted the process included mandatory classes by adoptive parents as well as a home study, which in total could take as long as six months.

The state also requires a six-month check after the adoption has taken place just to “double check” that the situation is working out. However, the state doesn’t have any legal bounds for monitoring a family after the first six-month period has passed.

The loving, 'chosen' Adoptive father did not have a prior criminal history in the county the divorced man is currently living. He had only six months to prove to an adoption agency/family service he would make a good, loving, protective dad.

God knows what this sexual predator did, or where he went, before he got married and agreed to adopt "his" five children... 4 girls, one boy. A point worth noting: the child abuse did not start within the first six months post adoption. It took years for "daddy" to act and make his unmonitored move.

While many posts, blogs and news articles are celebrating the story of adoption this Christmas-season, I like to remind readers, for these abused and "orphaned" children, unmonitored adoption is no gift or blessing.

Haitian children on their way to racistic France ?

Adopted Haitian Children Experience a White Christmas

Bertrand Guay/AFP/Getty Images

Nearly 200 adopted Haitian children arrived in Paris last weekend to a cold, snowy Christmas. Two chartered planes brought the children from Haiti after long delays and complications caused by last January's earthquake and the recent protests following the disputed election. A flight last Friday landed at Charles de Gaulle Airport with 84 children aboard, following an earlier flight with another 114 that arrived on Wednesday. The French foreign ministry estimates that as many as 1,000 Haitian children will have been adopted in France in 2010, compared with around 650 in 2009.

Foreign adoptions of Haitian children have been controversial, since many of the children are not orphans at all but given up by parents who cannot afford to raise them. While many of the children will have a better life materially in France, there are concerns about their adjustment to life in a very different culture and how well they will be accepted in a country that has seen a rise in racial tensions in recent years.

Read also: Adopted Haitian children reach France for Christmas

Sabtu, 25 Desember 2010

Adoption is not a Christmasgift !

A First Mother remembers: My Adopted Daughter's first Christmas gifts

Jane

Christmas has played a role in my relationship with my surrendered daughter Megan since the beginning. When she was born in November, 1966, I could not bear to sever our bonds completely. I left the hospital without signing adoption papers and she went into foster care. A social worker told me she had the perfect family for my daughter but they wanted a child less than a month old.
As the one month deadline approached and prospects for raising my daughter did not magically present themselves, I called the social worker and told her I would sign the papers. I added “I know this sounds silly but I’m worried the baby will not have any Christmas presents.”

On Christmas Day that year I fantasized about the loving couple who had my baby after many sorrowful years of childlessness. I tried to find joy in giving this gift to this couple, so much more deserving of this precious child than I. (After our reunion I learned that Megan’s adoptive parents did not contact the social services office until January and that they already had three children when they adopted Megan. Apparently the social worker made no effort to give Megan a home for the holidays.)

A Christmas CarolI know now that adoption is not a gift but a tribute to the gods of ignorance and want.

Shortly before Christmas in 1997, Megan now thirty-one years old, emailed that she wanted to send me a gift, something she had made. Megan and I had connected a few weeks earlier but we had not met. Other than a short conversation with my husband-to-be 29 years earlier, I had not discussed Megan’s existence with anyone. She lived near Chicago and I lived in Oregon. We planned to meet the following month.

I agonized over how to respond to her email. I was touched by Megan's offer and did not want to offend her. At the same time, I did not want to explain this gift to family members who knew nothing about. I was also curious about what she could have made. No one in my family was artistic. I envisioned a potholder; the kind children make at summer camp, elastic bands stretched across a frame.

I wrote back “I would love to have something you made.” When the package arrived, I put it in the closet.

A day or two after Christmas, I opened the box. Not a pot holder but two jars of fruit jelly and a jar of jalapeño jelly. I could not leave them in the closet since having jelly in my closet next to old purses, shoe boxes, and other paraphernalia accumulated in the 20 years we had lived in the house would be hard to explain. I placed the jelly in a kitchen cabinet next to jars of homemade jam my mother-in-law had given us, hiding them in plain sight. Tentative steps out of the closet.

Just before I was to leave for Chicago, I asked two of my raised daughters, Lucy and Julie, who were home for Christmas, to come into the kitchen to talk to me. (My oldest daughter Amy lived in Washington DC). (Telling my family about my daughter--and then going public) I explained that they had a sister. They were incredulous. Seeking to convince them that I was not delusional and that Megan did in fact exist, I held up a jar of jelly as proof. “Of course you have a sister,” I shouted. “Where do you think this jelly came from?”

The jelly, of course, has long since been eaten. The real gift Megan gave me that year—the gift of knowledge--endures forever.

Lorraine and I wish you a very Merry Christmas and a peaceful and joyous New Year.

Loneniless and Money creates desire for Adoption ?

Adoption & the Economy: Adopting a Baby

After a long career and a very successful life that is filled with material things and fabulous trips to hard-to-pronounce destinations, many are finding that they are still not happy. This economic crisis that the world is facing has helped some people to step back and take stock of their lives. Watching investments vanish into thin air has caught many by surprise. Despite retaining a certain level of financial comfort, they are in a word…alone. For many, this newfound loneliness and lack of satisfaction will translate into the need to bring someone new into their lives. They will make, for the first time, make a shift in priorities that won’t focus so much on being a part of the “in” crowd or being the “it” person; instead, they will want to become something more…a parent. Sometimes it takes a hard life lesson to help people to realize that life is so much more precious when you have someone to share it with, and a child can make it seem even more wonderful and fulfilling. Many may have suppressed the desire to have a child and have reach a point, physically, of no return.

The biological clock has stopped ticking or the thought of actually becoming pregnant at an advanced age is not at all appealing or realistic for them. In this instance, adoption is the perfect option. As people learn that they have all of this love inside of them that they have harbored, the thought of adoption seems more like a real opportunity for them to finally have that missing piece of their life’s puzzle. I remember feeling so ready to be a mom that it hurt. I only wish I had started earlier and had adopted more children. There are so many children available for adoption due to different circumstances. For those that are seriously considering taking the steps to initiate and go through the adoption process, they should realize that it is not simply deciding but taking the proper steps to make the dream a reality. Like anything important in life, adoption is multifaceted, intricate, and for some, a long and arduous process.

If someone is serious about becoming a parent through adoption, they must be able to show they are prepared to become a parent and present their case as to their ability to love, care for, and raise a child. It’s about more than just about money. Children don’t care how much money you have. They are not easily impressed by your custom-made suits or couture handbag. Children that enter your life through adoption need love, commitment, and a parent that is willing to care for them unconditionally. If that is what you have to offer, then adoption may be right for you. This global recession is having a huge impact on people and their relationships. From single people looking for mates through matchmaking services to couples looking for a child to shower with love through adoption, the bottom line of it all is that life is about more than just money. Life is about companionship, sharing, caring, and knowing that you are more than just a commodity or talking head. We are all people, rich or poor, great or small. For some ideas on the many ways to afford adoption, visit www.AdoptionFinancingInformation.com. If this economic crisis has brought you to this life crossroad, then you should seriously consider how to make that next step and open that new chapter in your life. You know that the culmination of your life’s experiences means that you have a lot to offer. Adoption can allow you the chance to give of yourself to another person…a child. The happiness that adoption makes possible will far exceed the years of financial returns that have been the hallmark of your life. In fact, money can’t buy that type of happiness. That real, long term happiness can only be acquired through love, hope, and care…which is exactly what you could give and receive from your newly adopted child. For more information about adoption, visit www.LifetimeAdoption.com

About Author
Mardie Caldwell, C.O.A.P. is a speaker and award-winning author of four books, including AdoptingOnline.com Adoption: Your Step-by-Step Guide. Mardie is also the talk show host of Let’s Talk Adoption.com with Mardie Caldwell. For more information visit www.MardieCaldwell.com This article is prot

Short URL: http://www.wallstreetstocks.net/?p=58085

The right to have a child ? No word about the right of adoptees...

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Yes, the North Carolina adoption ruling really is that bad

Since my post on Tuesday about the North Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Boseman v. Jarrell that second-parent adoption is not authorized by the state's statutes, I've received numerous disbelieving emails. Everyone wants me to say it's really not all that bad. Everyone thinks there must be a way around what the court actually did. So I'm going to use this post to clarify the status of gay and lesbian adoption in North Carolina.

First, the good news. A lesbian or gay man can adopt a child as a single person in North Carolina. Such an adoption is allowed regardless of whether the adoptive parent is living with a partner. In other words, the state has no ban on adoption by lesbians and gay men (as Florida did/does - the law is still on the books but the agency and courts are not enforcing it pursuant to an appeals court ruling that it is unconstitutional); nor does it ban adoption by a person who lives with an unmarried partner (as Utah and Arkansas do, although the constitutionality of the Arkansas ban is currently in the state supreme court).

The good news ends there. A same-sex couple cannot adopt jointly in North Carolina, because a separate statute (not at issue in Boseman) states that when an unmarried person petitions to adopt a child no other person can join in the petition. So two unmarried people, gay or straight, cannot adopt together in North Carolina. This eliminates both the ability of the couple to adopt a child from a public or private adoption agency and the ability of the couple to adopt together a child born to one of them. (In some states the way around the adoption statute's termination of the parental rights of the "natural" parent is for the couple to file a joint adoption petition whereby the bio parent loses her rights as a "natural" parent but simultaneously gains parental rights as an adoptive parent.)

And, in the most far reaching, shocking, and unique aspect of Boseman, all second-parent adoptions that have been granted in the state are void. With the stroke of a pen, hundreds of North Carolina children have gone from having two legal parents to having only one. While other courts have ruled that second-parent adoptions are not permitted, until this case none had ruled that all previously granted adoptions were invalid. The court ruled that a second-parent adoption granted in North Carolina is void ab initio, a Latin term for "from the beginning." The following analogy might be useful: a man and a woman can get a marriage license and even have a wedding ceremony, but if one of them is still legally married to someone else (whether s/he realizes it or not), the couple is not married. They have a signed piece of paper that says they are married, but when it matters legally, they are not married. They were never married...from the beginning. So it is with the adoption decrees now sitting in the files, or adorning the walls, of the state's same-sex couples. They were never valid, from the beginning.

The pieces of paper still exist, and, if not challenged, they may facilitate keeping a child on the nonbio mom's health insurance or letting the nonbio mom make a medical decision or pick up a child from day care. But the validity of the adoption can be challenged by anyone -- a relative who does not want the child to inherit as a grandchild of the nonbio mom's parents, for example; or the nonbio mom after the couple splits up, as Jarrell did in this case -- and then it will be as though it never existed.

When an egregious case surfaces, the lawyers who care about these issues (including me) will try to come up with theories to protect the well-being of the children. For example, there may be a child right now receiving social security survivors benefits because her nonbio mom died after a North Carolina second-parent adoption was granted. If the government tries to cut off those benefits, we're going to work hard to develop an argument that the child has a right to continuing receiving them. And we may indeed find something that works. We don't give up without a fight when it comes to justice for our families.

But the Boseman ruling is unusually extreme. I'll be looking to gay rights attorney par excellence Sharon Thompson to see what she comes up with next to protect the children of North Carolina's same-sex couples.

A child or family as Christmas present ?

A Christmas adoption: Congrats Lonkar family

23 December 2010 No Comments Michelle Reese

Cherrie Lonkar and her daughter, Maile. Photo by Chalice Leaman Photography

This morning, dozens of parents and children filled the lobby at one of Maricopa County’s courthouses.

Boys were dressed in ties and sweaters. Girls donned their best sparkly dresses and shoes.
Families and friends awaited their turn to enter the small room with the judge.
It was adoption day for at least half a dozen families.
The Lonkar family of Gilbert arrived a few minutes before their scheduled appointment. They were joined by aunts, uncles, grandparents, cousins and many friends.
It was my first experience at a hearing to finalize an adoption. I knew from Cherrie and Brian Lonkar it would be brief. It was their third adoption, second this year.
But it was also very touching.
As their three boys – in matching grey and red sweaters – sat with family members, Cherrie and Brian propped Maile Jane, their first daughter, up on their laps and answered a series of questions from the judge.

The 1-year-old didn’t sit still long, but she seemed to enjoy the event.
After the judge made the final statement, Cherrie read a letter to her little girl. In it, she spoke of the future and the many dreams Maile can dream, and Cherrie’s hope she can help her achieve them.

She spoke of wanting to share a love for people, nature and life.
She told Maile about how she has brought out the best in her mommy and how her mommy hopes to do the same in return.

Then the family gathered everyone for pictures – each parent placing a child on each hip.

The family and their kids – all four – are now Lonkars.

Just in time for Christmas.

Jumat, 24 Desember 2010

Abuse of weak childcare - and protection system in Haiti

Haiti: A child for Christmas?

22 Dec 2010
International Adoption Haiti

Published by Darcissac, Marion

1383_haiti_tdh_offices_web_embed

On December 21, 2010, two French aircrafts were chartered to transfer in emergency 318 Haitian children from their country to adoptive parents in France. Yet, for most of these children, no ruling has been issued and therefore, they can not be legally adopted. Most importantly, their family situation has not been verified by the Haitian authorities. These children might still have a family and they were not prepared to leave their country.

France justifies the emergency of these transfers by claiming that these children could be contaminated by cholera. Terre des hommes is currently collaborating with 8 institutions (700 children) in the Leogane’s department (earthquake zone) where no cases of cholera have been detected so far. Institutions which are welcoming children, such as nurseries or orphanages, were the first to benefit from a sufficient hygiene’s equipment as a preventive measure to avoid contagion.

“This decision is in complete contradiction with the position taken by the Permanent Bureau of The Hague Conference and International Organizations which reported during the first wave of adoptions after the earthquake, that international adoption is not a solution following emergencies” , says Marlène Hofstetter, Tdh’s Head of adoption. “This is why Tdh strongly denounces the mass evacuation of these children”.

After suffering strong criticisms by the Hague Convention’s member countries during the Special Commission in June 2010 on the accelerated adoptions of Haitian children, France decided to better regulate those adoptions and to respect legal procedures, in the interest of the child. However under the pretext of “saving” children from illness or death, the French authorities hid a very selfish action. What about the other 200,000 to 300,000 children who do not receive the same attention and continue to live in institutions in Haiti?

Read also:

Another 113 Haitian children arrived in France

Adopted Haitian children fly in to paris on Christmas Eve

Abused by the Adoption System, who cares ?!

No help for stolen adoptees

Arthur Gorrie | 24th December 2010


ADOPTIVE children's advocate Kerri Saint, of Imbil, says help is available for people wrongly institutionalised as children, such as Gympie's Ken Bland.

White Australians Stolen Heritage founder Kerri Saint (right) with supporter Robyn Street.

Craig Warhurst

ADOPTIVE children’s advocate Kerri Saint, of Imbil, says help is available for people wrongly institutionalised as children, such as Gympie’s Ken Bland.

But, she says, there is still no help and still has not been any apology for the group to which she belongs, kids stolen from their parents and adopted out.

Mr Bland came to The Gympie Times in response to Ms Saint’s story, published last week.

Both told of horrific abuse at the hands of carers forced on them by state intervention after they were kidnapped by child welfare workers from loving but low-income homes.

Ms Saint, who says few realise that the distinct concerns of adoptees have never been addressed or compensated, said Mr bland may not realise the help, in the form of counselling and financial compensation, which may be available to him.

“There is free counselling and compensation payments of anything from $3000 up to the highest I’m aware of, $37,000.

“That’s for people who were abused in the course of institutional or foster care, people who were wards of the state or under guardianship.

“They can contact the Ford Foundation at Lotus Place in Brisbane on 38 44 0966 or freecall 1800 035 588 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 1800 035 588 end_of_the_skype_highlighting or its website www.fordfoundation.org.au’.

“But still nothing has been done for kids stolen from their parents for adoption and they are the people who are the subject of the Senate Inquiry (which is taking submissions up to February 28.””

Anyone wanting help with a submission can contact Kerri on 54 84 5949.

The insightful life of a Prominent Korean Adoptee

Korean adoptee … learns Korean!

With courtesy of Jane J. Trenka (author of: language of Blood)

I’ve been thinking a lot about my process of learning Korean lately, so in order to stop thinking about that process and get back to actually studying (which is why this blog has been dead basically since I started studying in September), I thought I’d jot some thoughts down.

A lot has been said about how difficult it is for Korean adoptees to learn Korean as compared to other people, such as Korean Americans or even the white partners of Korean adoptees. I think there’s a lot of truth to that, and I have experienced that. However, if you’re a Korean adoptee like myself and you want to take back what is rightfully yours, then you have to find some way to grapple with the emotional issues that come along with learning the language. You also have to find a way to access the language education, because it’s not like your white mom is going to teach you Korean while she cooks up a hot batch of kimchi chiggae for you. And if you’re an adoptee like myself who was more or less afraid of Korean people until quite recently, you have to summon up the courage to talk with them.

Q: What do you call someone who speaks three languages?

A: Trilingual

Q: What do you call someone who speaks two languages?

A: Bilingual

Q: What do you call someone who speaks one language?

A: American

A little about my language learning: I did not have ANY exposure to the Korean language at any time growing up. The first time I heard the Korean language was the first time I met Koreans, which was when I was 23 years old. I did a poor job of learning Spanish in high school and German in college, so I have never been wired to be bilingual. So I started from scratch, like probably a lot of other American adoptees. (I think most younger Europeans at least have studied a second language seriously, so they know better how to go about learning a foreign language systematically.)

I was living paycheck to paycheck in the U.S. while I worked in musical non-profit, so I never had enough money to take a Korean class at the university. So, in 1995, when I fell off the airplane in Korea on an adoption agency Motherland Tour, all I could say was “Hello” to my mother in the most formal way that I had learned from those Barron’s diplomat tapes. Despite trying to study with tapes and so forth by myself, and traveling numerous times back and forth to Korea to visit my family, my Korean continued to completely suck until I came back to Korea for an adoptee program at Inje University in 2004.

You seem very nice, and I like you, but I don’t want to talk to you

I think I made a smart move at Inje by hanging out mostly with Korean students. I felt it was my last chance to grab the language, so I didn’t want to waste what I thought was going to be my first and last prolonged time in Korea by speaking English with adoptees all the time. (Little did I know I would still be here six years later!) I made some Korean friends, and they took such good care of me in teaching me the basics. They were so patient. My guy friend ate a lot of ice cream with me while teaching me how to say, “I eat.” “I ate.” “I want to eat.” “I will eat.” My female roommate enforced 10 minutes every day in which I was not allowed to communicate in English. Then she actually taped a children’s poster of numbers above my bunkbed so I could practice counting before bed. (I had the bottom bunk). At the time I was 32 years old.

Why dramas are no good

A lot of Korean people try to give helpful advice by saying that you should watch dramas to improve your Korean language. I think that maybe that works if you’re a gyopo and you grew up at least seeing Korean faces and hearing Korean language in your home, even if it was only among adults. If you’re an adoptee, I don’t think that is helpful for you until you’re at least Level 3 or 4, which is I suppose the level that a lot of 1.5 or 2nd generation gyopos would test into without even trying (such as my Korean American husband, who tested into Level 4 at Yonsei without even trying.) I’m now doing Level 4 at Seoul National University, and I think that dramas are still only helpful to me an extent. I have to watch them on my computer and rewind them and listen again and again and again. If you have to learn textbook Korean like most adoptees do, then anything that is not a perfectly grammatical sentence is hard to understand in the lower levels. That means a lot of language used in dramas, movies, comic books, and songs is hard to understand. Just think about it — even in English, we do not use perfect sentences or pronounce everything the “correct” way. If you have no background in Korean, then anything that deviates from what you learned in the textbook is a big “Huh?” And of course, there is the problem of regional dialects. Imagine if you are learning English and suddenly you are supposed to understand a Texas accent, a British accent, and a Minnesota accent. Forget it! Incomprehensible! Same goes for a lot of Korean gangster movies.

I want schnapps. There are no (is no?) schnapps in Korea.

For every Korean word I learn, I think I lose five in English and some grammar rules fly out of my head. Anyway, I have a lot to say about this, so this little thoughtstream on language learning for adoptees will be continued … in the meantime, have the happiest of holidays! What I would give for a hot girlie drink with whipped cream and chocolate sprinkles!! All of you people who live in the land of peppermint and raspberry schnapps, have some boozy hot cocoa for me!

Next up: How I ignored my emotions and oppression long enough to learn some grammar

Read als the interesting posts of Mei Ling on this article