Tampilkan postingan dengan label ACT. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label ACT. Tampilkan semua postingan

Selasa, 08 Maret 2011

Request Indian parents for DNA testing rejected

ADOPTED BOY DID NOT AGREE

Source: http://www.rechtspraak.nl


Zwolle-Lelystad, March 7, 2011 – The Family Court of Zwolle-Lelystad has ruled on March 4 in the case of the Indian couple. The Indian couple’s request for a DNA test to determine that a boy adopted by Dutch parents is their biological son, was dismissed by the Court.

Kidnapping

The Indian couple was robbed in 1999 of their son when he was two years old. He would be with the adoptive parents in the Netherlands. These adoptive parents would have adopted their son would in good faith and take care of the now 12-year-old boy since many years.




Request of Indian couple

Besides the request for DNA tests the couple also asked to identify their biological parenthood, information on the boy and contact. The court also rejected those requests.

Conclusion expert

The Court has at its meeting on June 23, 2010 appointed an expert because the boy did not agree with DNA. The expert concludes that the question of whether DNA testing should be done is primarily a question of timing. Timing in which the pace of the minor must be decisive.

Court decision and consideration

The Court held that in itself is possible that the Indian couple are the biological parents of the boy. Also, the starting point is that in principle it is in the interests of adopted children that they know who their biological parents are.

In assessing the requests, the Court considers the various interests of the involved, but the interests of the child prevails.

Given the development of the minor and the events so far the court considers it currently not in the interest of the minor, now that he is not willing to cooperate, to order him to cooperate in a DNA investigation.

The request for a DNA test to be carried out is therefore rejected. In view of this, the court cannot agree to the remaining requests. The question whether the Indian couple are the biological parents, cannot be answered by the Court before DNA testing has taken place.

LJ Nummer BP6936

Source: Court Zwolle-Lelystad

Date actuality: 7 maart 2011

Selasa, 20 Oktober 2009

Romanian Orphans, ready for export to the EU


Source: Jurnalul National of 20 October 2009 – translated article

European Commission and Romanian Office for Adoptions quietly force to reopen international adoptions

- REPORTING FROM BRUSSELS - Romanian Office for Adoptions prepares since almost 3 months to modify law 273 of 2004, the law that stopped the trafficking of children from Romania to other countries, under the guise of international adoptions.

ORA officials have not acted on their own, but with the support of interest groups in the U.S., Italy, France and other countries.

By Mircea Opris
20/10/2009

These groups were used by a Directorate of the European Commission, which will hold a conference for the reopening of international adoptions from Romania, on 31 November and 1 December in Strasbourg.

The European Commission requires changing of the law, imposed by itself as a condition of our entry in the EU. Jurnalul National was able to look into the corridors of these international operations, with the help of a source inside the European Commission, whose identity we will protect for understandable reasons.

ROMANIANS WAITED FOR THE RESIGNATION OF THE GOVERNMENT

The Romanian Office for Adoptions paved the way for amendments to the law prohibiting international adoptions since the summer, when they organised two conferences, both held in Timisoara. The first took place in early September and referred to the rights of the adopted child. Here were assembled all the directors of the child protection directorates in the country for a central database for the adoption process, data about the number of adoptable children and of adoptions in process. A second conference was also held in Timisoara, away from the eyes of the EU mission in Bucharest.

In the period 27-30 September 2009, UNICEF Romania and the National Authority for Child Protection (ANPDC) organised the National Conference which opens the series of events dedicated to celebrating the 20th anniversary of the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Attending were representatives ANPDC, DGASPC sites, UN agencies in Romania and other government institutions and NGOs.

Here, Romanian and international institutions, together with NGOs involved in adoptions have finalized, in order to promote later, by legislation the Integrated National Action Plan on Preventing and Combating Violence against children. Coordinators were Ileana Savu, Secretary of State at the ANPDC, and Edmond McLoughney, UNICEF Representative in Romania.

With only one day before the predictable failure of the Boc 2 Government, ORA proposes, through a Memorandum sent to the Government, to reopen international adoptions. The document prepared by ORA shows that during the four years of implementation of Law 273/2004, concerning the legal status of adoption, it was found that there are some categories of children who are "hard to adopt" because the regulatory framework in force does not identify appropriate solutions with a permanent character. The initiators of the document state that such a measure should be taken, having regard to provide equal opportunities for all children separated from their natural families, who can not be reintegrated and can not be adopted in Romania.

The role of "soldier of sacrifice" was for Secretary of State of the Romanian Office for Adoptions, Bogdan Panait, who said the reopening of international adoption will be done only in cooperation with accredited authorities of the respective States, in order to avoid corruption. He fails to convince why this memorandum was submitted to the government at a time when Romania has no government.

"I submitted the memorandum Monday morning before the vote of the motion (the fall of the government - sic). I do not know what will happen to it. I am in a hurry, it's one thing we wanted to submit for political debate and decision, and I think that this Government could discuss this Memorandum, "said Bogdan Panait. Clearly, ORA took advantage of political turmoil in Bucharest to demand a change of the law, to negotiate it with the next government to be appointed.

Approval of this Memorandum means practically the amendment of Law 273 on the rules of adoption. Some of negotiations with representatives of U.S. and EU countries, interested in adoptions from Romania could be possible to adopt the memorandum and adoption law. "When I came here, I had a discussion with the Prime Minister (Emil Boc - Sic). Of course, there were many complaints from families and international fury, but the discussion was to value and change the law.

Sure, he was not clear if it was about international adoption. I have taken up this mission. The modification was made. The law is ready for 99 percent, in the coming weeks it will be subjected to public debate and will be posted on the website. But from the context in which we made the changes to the law, I have concluded - and because of international protocols - that we can go ahead with the idea and start procedures for international adoption.

Sure, this is not a decision which I can make. And that’s why I made this Memorandum, a memorandum which is very neutral. It is up to the Government to decide to what extent it is the political moment, we have statistics, I mentioned the commitment of Romania in the field and the decision will be entirely to the government," said Bogdan Panait a few days ago. Interestingly, in early September, in an exclusive interview to Jurnalul National, the same Secretary of State said that "As long as I am the director of ORA, if the government will ask me to find a solution to the international adoptions, for the moment at least, such thing is excluded".

Once more it will create the image that again we will trade, traffic and other dealings with children. In three or four years perhaps, but it is the responsibility the Romanian State must bear." Powered by internal and external pressure or not, Bogdan Panait had no patience for three or four years and urged the reopening of international adoptions as soon as possible.

SLAP FROM THE GOVERNMENT

Subtle movement to amend the Law 273, which became a mandatory condition of Romania’s accession to the EU, was dismantled by the Government that gave its last breath. On October 16, the Romanian Executive announced officially that it does not support the memorandum initiated by the Romanian Office for Adoptions, which proposes reopening the international adoptions. The Memorandum represents the point of view of the institution and is not endorsed by the Emil Boc Cabinet Emil, still in office. The Government had no discussion about this Memorandum and therefore has not taken any decision on this document.

Prime Minister still in office, Emil Boc, believes that current legislation in the field of international adoptions is in accordance with international law and European standards. The same view was exposed by former PSD Foreign Minister, Cristian Diaconescu.

ADOPTION MAFIA WORKS THROUGH THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

The European Commission and the Council of Europe have prepared the international conference "Challenges of the procedures for adoption in Europe", which originally was to be held on 26 and 27 November in Strasbourg. Beyond discussions of principle, the ultimate aim of the conference is to develop a joint recommendation that Romania should follow the Bulgarian model, which is to reopen international adoptions. Those of the European Commission and NGOs who oppose this idea immediately came into conflict with the organizers.

The website announcing the conference and where one could register was suspended and amended several times, and those interested to participate could not register. Subsequently, only NGOs approved by the organizers were informed by e-mail, and not at the official site of the conference, that the dates had changed and the conference would be held between November 30 and December 1. The worst thing is that the team of the European Commission in charge of organising the conference is not legally allowed to do so.

Specifically, the Directorate General for Justice, Freedom and Security of the European Commission, the unit E2 - Civil Justice, headed by the Finnish Salla Saastamoinen organises the conference. The coordinator of the organisational team is the Italian Patrizia De Luca, working in that directorate. According to the organigram of the European Commission, the Rights of the Child are part of the D1 of Directorate D of the European Commission, led by the Romanian Aurel Ciobanu-Dordea. Sources in the EC Directorate D told National Journal that this structure has no involvement in organising the conference in Strasbourg, although it is the only unit that has competence in children's rights in the European Commission.

The same source says that Directorate E2 violates the official regulations of the EU, more precisely the European Union anti-corruption policy, which states that a Directorate can not organise actions on issues that do not fall within their powers, conform the Communication on Anti-Corruption Policy, number 317 of 2003, addressed to the European Council and the European Parliament.

HOW TO SUBSTITUTE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

The organisational team E2 of the Directorate of Justice has hired a private firm that bought an Internet domain,www.adoptionprocedure.net, announcing the upcoming conference. Normally, the conference should have been officially announced on the Internet pages of the European Commission and the Council of Europe. Subsequently, the team only had contact with organisations and NGOs who are in favour of reopening international adoptions and ignore all others and international media interested in this subject. Many last-minute changes were only announced on the website of the conference at the last minute, or not announced at all.

Jurnalul National managed exclusively to unveil the secrecy around this so important conference, even at the European Commission in Brussels, from a source working in the Directorate of Justice caught offside, ie unit E2. This source claims that postponing the conference has nothing to do with the submission of the Government memorandum of ORA in Bucharest, but that the new government which will be installed until the conference, November 30, could give a favourable opinion of the proposed change of Romanian Office for Adoptions.

To the conference no nongovernmental organization from Romania or from another country that is hostile to reopen international adoptions was invited, the ultimate goal of the meeting in Strasbourg.

"We invited to the conference those organizations that have a closer connection (they coincide with those that oversaw international adoptions in Romania until 2004 and continued lobbying for the reopening them – Sic.) and we can not invite everyone who registered or the press because the conference hall has only 150 seats. The website does not work all the time, because it is under construction, because the conference agenda and guest list is not yet complete.

From Romania only three guests will participate from State institutions. One of them, Bogdan Panait, director of ORA. I do not remember the name of the other two. We pay to participate, just travel and accommodation, for participants approved by us, with whom we worked, a total of 10 NGOs. Among them the Nordic Adoption, an umbrella association of 15 adoption agencies, very important in northern Europe and other organizations from France, and SERA, SERA whose leadership has moved to Geneva, International Social Service, and Amici dei Bambini in Italy.

So, from Romania will come only three guests from the State and Edmond McLoughney, UNICEF representative in Romania, who will speak on behalf of Romania, told us the source of the European Commission. Interestingly, the last topic of the conference will be "Towards a European policy on adoption ", where the case and experiences of Romania and Bulgaria will be analysed, and Frenchman Jean-Marie Cavada, Member of the European Parliament and a close associate of French pro-adoption lobby in Romania, will talk about a common adoption policy, because other countries have opened adoptions, only Romania has not done this, though is part of the European Union.

We will have a Hungarian adoptive parent who lives in Britain, who will speak about the problems he had when he adopted a child in Hungary. This conference is a sequel, a follow-up to the conference in 2006, when it was tried also to make Romania to understand how necessary it is to reopen international adoptions, as well as other EU countries. We will not solve the problem immediately, but the conference has to convince Romania that international adoption can be resumed, like in other EU countries, such as for example Bulgaria, which has responded positively to this request for international adoptions.

The fact that Romania has a law against international adoption is the fault of former European rapporteur for Romania, Baroness Emma Nicholson, who said that international adoption means trafficking in children. She used his influence to halt all adoptions and make the entry of Romania into the EU to stop adoptions. Now we try to convince Romania to re-open adoptions, like other countries in Europe,” our source in Brussels told us.

Senin, 19 Oktober 2009

Search a Child, Pay Cash - The Adoption Lobby

Search a Child, Pay Cash - The Adoption Lobby, the documentary shows the preparation for a world market of children.

Because, a European Adoption Policy would lead that European children will be made available for the international adoption industry. Whereas the European Union asked from Romania to become like other EU countries, and not to export children, now the Adoption Lobby wants to reverse that and to have the whole of Europe to become like Romania was....

The Story looks into how the system of intercountry adoption work and how political pressure is applied to ease the business in children.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3:

Part 4

Part 5

INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION Child Protection or a Breach of Rights?


BY ROELIE POST

Author Roelie Post wants to distance herself from pro and anti-adoption labels and direct the discussion back to the heart of the matter: whether intercountry adoption is a child protection measure, if children have rights in their own country, and if intercountry adoption is ultimately a breach of such rights?

Cherche un enfant, paie cash. Le lobby de l'adoption.

o Un film de Golineh Atai sur la WDR.]

o Lundi 7 septembre 2009. 22h.

o Jeudi 10 septembre 2009. 14h15.

o Samedi 12 septembre 2009. 22h. ARD Digital TV.

Marineta Ciofu a perdu toute trace de son enfant. Il y a presque 10 années, la femme roumaine issue d'un milieu pauvre avait laissé sa fille illégitime dans une pouponnière - avec la ferme intention de la ramener dès que elle-même serait dans une meilleure situation. Mais soudainement, la jeune fille avait disparu. Presque dix ans plus tard, Marineta apprend la vérité. Son enfant avait été adoptée. En faveur d'une famille américaine.

merci à copie par Abandon & adoption

„Suche Kind, zahle bar - Die Adoptionslobby

Ein Film von Golineh Atai

Montag, 07. September 2009, 22.00 - 22.45 Uhr

Donnerstag, 10. September 2009, 14.15 - 15.00 Uhr (Wdh.).

Marineta Ciofu mit ihren drei Söhnen

Marineta Ciofu hat jede Spur von ihrem Kind verloren. Vor fast 10 Jahren musste die Rumänin aus ärmlichen Verhältnissen ihre uneheliche Tochter in einem Babyheim zurückgelassen – mit der festen Absicht, sie zurückzuholen, sobald es ihr selbst besser ginge. Doch plötzlich war das Mädchen verschwunden. Fast zehn Jahre später erfährt Marineta die Wahrheit. Ihr Kind war adoptiert worden. Von einer amerikanischen Familie.

Roelie Post, EU-Beamtin, auf Recherchereise durch Rumänien

Die Geschichte hatte im Grunde 1989 begonnen. Damals kamen die ersten Bilder aus Rumänien - Bilder aus Kinderheimen, die Folterkammern glichen. Halbverhungerte, psychisch gestörte Kinder. Der Westen stand unter Schock, und wollte helfen – egal wie. Zehntausende rumänische Kinder wurden zur Adoption ins Ausland gegeben. Die internationale Kinderwohlfahrt schuf die Mär von den Niemandskindern, die niemand haben wolle in ihrer Heimat.

Rumänien 1989 war der Beginn der „Adoptionsindustrie“ reicher westlicher Länder und für Fälle, wie dem von Marineta Ciofu, deren Kind ohne Ihre Einwilligung verschwand. Sie hat nicht mal das Recht zu erfahren wohin.

die story verfolgt, wie das System der Auslandsadoptionen funktioniert, und wie politisch Druck ausgeübt wird, um das Geschäft mit den Kindern zu erleichtern.

Redaktion: Barbara Schmitz

Jumat, 25 September 2009

WHEN CHILDREN BECOME A COMMODITY


Political TV "Search a child - pay cash. The Adoption Lobby" - report about so-called humanitarian foreign adoptions


Cologne, "They should make their own children, as I have done it, just as my mother has made us. Have they not the same body

as us? "Marineta Ciofu is outraged. They just explained the woman from the North-eastern Romania that her daughter Mihaela was adopted by Americans. Ten years before Marineta brought the girl into a children's home because at that time she could not care for her. When her situation improved, she wanted to get her back, but the girl had disappeared. Without her consent, Mihaela had been given to an American family.

Marineta's child is just one of some 30,000 Romanian children that were 'mediated' abroad over the past 20 years. Why do international adoption have such influential advocates, what does it mean to those concerned, and who benefits from it? Golineh Atai looks for answers to these questions in her report "Search a Child - pay cash - The adoption lobby" which the WDR television broadcasts on Monday, September 7, at 22 clock.

For over four years, journalist Atai deals with the subject. She had noticed that the reports of international adoption are usually about the adoptive parents, who ardently wish for a child. But hardly anyone asked about the feelings of biological mothers or the children involved. In 2005 she received for the subject "International adoptions in the global children market", a research grant from the Otto-Brenner Prize, which allowed detailed investigations in India.

Behind the help for poor children in reality there are selfish businesses and motives,that also the Dutch Roelie Post knows. Whether it would not be better to help poor parents to help themselves, she wants to know. Roelie Post was from 1999 to 2005 responsible for children’s rights for the European Commission. She should see to it that the international adoptions in Romania would be discontinued. This was one of the conditions for the admission of Romania into the EU.

What Golineh Atai hears from Roelie Post and her former boss Guenter Verheugen, in interviews, is outrageous. Influential lobbyists practice high-level pressure. In particular, the Americans see their "right to adopt" threatened. In the eye of prospective adoptive parents the EU’s policy prevented that "thousands of Romanian children could come home'. That home, of course, was at the other side of the Atlantic.

Together with Roelie Post, Atai was on the road in Romania and visited, apart from Marineta Ciofu, two Romanian families, who adopted children from their own country. But this was a difficult battle, because the authorities and adoption agencies did not want them as parents. Money from abroad, often disguised as donations, were better for them. Police and prosecutors were under one blanket with the Mafia, says a father, who had to fight for five years for Ioana. Three weeks the family hid themselves because the child was already "booked". Roelie Post considers such international adoptions as legalized child trafficking. Golineh Atai’s film shows forcefully that much of what seems humanitarian, ultimately is just an inhumane business.


Monika Herrmann-Schiel (CBA) Monday, 7 September, 22 clock, WDR