Selasa, 25 Mei 2010

AUSTRALIA - ICASN, Lynelle has Resigned from ICASN/ICA involvement

Lynelle Beveridge

May 23, 2010 at 8:35am


Well, the time has come for me to say goodbye to the intercountry adoption community. I've created and been involved with ICASN since late 1998 and I now have other challenges and areas that need my energy. It has been a rewarding journey and I've been blessed to personally know many wonderful adoptees, adoptive parents, local birth parents, Govt professionals and non-govt professionals, and others involved in intercountry adoption. Thank you all for your contribution to making ICASN such a success!

The ICASN State Reps will still continue on in their state roles and can now be your central points of contact. I will no longer be updating or maintaining the ICASN website and it will remain in place up until early 2011, unless someone wants to keep it going and pay for the Domain registration.

I would like to take the opportunity to thank Mary Waterhouse/Frost from NMIT in VIC who has kindly hosted the ICASN website free of charge and provided technical support all these years .. without that, ICASN would never have grown from it's original 30 adoptee members in Australia, to today's 500+ in Australia and around the world ... and that's not counting those who joined via Facebook ....

I wish you all well in your journeys and my one hope is that eventually the institution of intercountry adoption will come to embrace and empower the voices of birth families to be heard and have an impact on the policies and processes involved between sending and receiving countries - I see this as the last group who remain unheard & disempowered in the triad for ICA.

I have also resigned from my position on the Federal Government's NICAAG body and hope there will be many adoptees who apply for the position as it's important for our voice to be involved in all levels of Intercountry Adoption.

My email address will cease to exist by 30 June 2010. Both the Facebook & Yahoo groups will be moderated by the ICASN State Reps.

Many thanks
Regards
Lynelle Beveridge begin_of_the_skype_highlighting end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Founder/Director
Inter-Country Adoptee Support Network (ICASN)
http://www.facebook.com/l/1fd75;www.icasn.org/

Mb: +61 411 126 427 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting +61 411 126 427 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
E: icasn@bigpond.net.au
P: PO Box 6550 Baulkham Hills NSW 2153

-------

Dear Lynelle,

With great regret we have read your resignation of ICASN and also your departure from the Intercountry Adoption activities now we arrive at a new dawn of the history for Adoptees. United Adoptees International has great respect what you have done in Australia to establish a framework for Adoptees and the intervention on political and societal level.

Australia, but also the Adoptee world internationally, will loose with you, an important player in the field of intercountry adoption for the interest of Adoptees in many fields. Your efforts and your contribution to the worldwide dialogue of intercountry adoption in the best interest of the (adult) adoptees will not be forgotten.

We want to thank you for your support and outstanding cooperation and hope that for those who will take over your responsibilities and task, which is hardly to do in our opinion, will cooperate on the same level and with the same diligence as you did with United Adoptees International.

On behalf of the Board & Management United Adoptees International I want to wish you and your family all the best and happiness.

Hilbrand W.S. Westra

Managing Director UAI


Senin, 24 Mei 2010

RUSSIA - Sent to the "Ranch for Kids Project,"

Facing the real issues in international adoption

Russia issues a suspension of adoptions by US families, but the pause may not force agencies and governments alike to tackle the true problems behind the issue.
Facing the real issues in international adoption


Americans adopt between 2,000 and 4,000 children from Russia annually, but six months after one such adoption, a single woman decided she no longer wanted to be Artyom Savelyev’s mother. Sending the 7-year-old boy on a transatlantic flight back to Russia by himself, Torry Hansen set off an international incident that led to a suspension of adoptions of Russian children by Americans.
Bookmark and Share

The Hansen case, rather than the spark that started the fire, was merely another log on a long-blazing inferno. Artyem Savelyev’s case is just the latest in a series of adoptions of Russian children by Americans that have proven to be far from in the children’s best interest. Since 1996 there have been approximately 16 reported cases of child abuse—burnings, beatings, starving—committed by American adoptive parents to Russian-born children. This abuse has resulted in 12 murder convictions, with three cases currently pending.

In addition, there are an unknown number of Russian-born children no longer living with those who promised to be their parents forever. Some have been sent to the "Ranch for Kids Project," which houses “troubled children adopted primarily from Russia" at locations in Wyoming, Montana and Maryland, according to the website Ranchforkids.org. There is also an underground network of families who take in children that other adopters can no longer “handle,” some claiming they fear for the safety of their families. Joyce Sterkel, 63, who runs the Ranch estimates that approximately 300 children have passed through the facility.

On Again off Again

In 2000, and again in 2003, Russia insisted foreign adoptions be handled only by accredited agencies that would be required to provide Russia with reports including at-home visits by a social worker at six months and one, two, and three years post-placement.

“One of the major problems,” said Alexander Demkin, Russia’s vice consul in New York, is that the adoptive parents obtain American citizenship for the children and cancel their Russian citizenship, which makes it impossible for Russians to follow-up.

In April 2006, the Russian Prosecutor General's Office attempted yet again to take the reigns and prevent further abuses by calling for the revocation of the accreditation of 12 U.S. adoption agencies, stating that the companies had failed to file post-adoption reports on the condition of Russian children.

Now again, adoptions have been suspended and officials have called for a freeze until a bilateral treaty is signed enforcing, among other things, post-adoption monitoring. An American diplomatic delegation visited Moscow and reported that a newly negotiated adoption agreement would soon be signed by both nations, possibly by the end of June.

Some child advocates suggest that in addition to the suggested bilateral agreement, Russia should ratify the Hague Convention on International Adoption to put teeth into any agreements between them and any country receiving Russian children. Another suggestion involves transparency.

Adoptive parents regularly report a lack of full, complete and accurate disclosure of medical history being transmitted from Russian orphanages to American adoption agencies and then to the adopting parents. Some 60 percent of internationally adopted children have health problems, according to Dr. Nancy Curtis, who heads Children’s Hospital of Oakland’s International Adoption Clinic. Dana E. Johnson, M.D., Ph.D. at the University of Minnesota adoption medicine center claims that 85 percent of the children diagnosed with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome were born in Russia, though few receive an official diagnosis of FAS.

American adoption agencies routinely ask prospective adopters what types of disabilities they are and are not willing and able to deal with which creates expectations that their requested criteria will be met. Adoption blogs often feature those who have adopted from Russia lamenting: “I didn’t sign up for this” or “I never would have adopted him had I known.”

The root of the issue

Adoption agencies may fail to adequately prepare adopters and orphanages may downplay the risk for attachment disorders, educational delays, behavioral issues, as well as serious psychological and physical disabilities among institutionalized children, but the reality is that international adoption is big business. Fees average $40,000 per adoption, not including payoffs.

The Russian state pays about $3 billion a year in salaries for orphanage employees. And orphanages provide jobs in many depressed regions. Americans report that adopting from Russia involves payments of large sums of cash in a corrupt bureaucratic system.

“It has one goal, which is to preserve itself,” said Boris L. Altshuler, chairman of Right of the Child, an advocacy group in Moscow, and a member of a Kremlin advisory group.

Child welfare experts from Save the Children, SOS Children’s Village, UNICEF and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child all call for international adoption to be a last resort, used only after exhausting all efforts to keep children with their extended kin, local community, or within the same country, language and culture. However, More than 700,000 Russian children live in orphanages—more than at the end of World War II, and Yelena B. Mizulina, the chairwoman of the parliamentary committee on family and children, recently reported that within Russia during the past three years, more than 30,000 children were sent back to institutions by their adoptive, foster or guardianship families.

The best interests of vulnerable children need to be put first, overriding profiting from their misfortune. Hopefully the international media exposure of Artyom’s solo flight will lead Russia and the United States to enact constructive measures regarding optimal care for children, including prioritizing family preservation, dealing with substance abuse recovery and reduction and increasing domestic adoption.

Mirah Riben is author of The Stork Market: America’s Multi-Billion Dollar Unregulated Industry (2007) and shedding light on…the Dark Side of Adoption (1988) in addition to multiple articles. She is former Director of the American Adoption Congress and has been researching, writing and speaking about adoption issues for more than 30 years.

Ireland - adoption agency which engages in illegal practices should be de-registered


Adoption agencies to be struck off for ‘wrongdoing’

Friday, May 21, 2010

ANY adoption agency which engages in illegal practices should be de-registered and if necessary the case referred to An Garda Síochána, the chairman of the Adoption Board has said.

The issue of illegal adoptions was raised with Geoffrey Shannon following the Irish Examiner’s investigation into the case of Tressa Reeves, whose son was illegally adopted and falsely registered as the natural child of the adoptive parents. This was facilitated by St Patrick’s Guild adoption agency, which remains fully accredited by the Adoption Board, despite the board being aware of the case since 2001.

Speaking on RTÉ’s Prime Time, chairman of the Adoption Board Geoffrey Shannon gave a personal guarantee that any such cases would be investigated and if necessary referred to the relevant authorities.

"I don’t want to become involved in discussing individual cases, but what I am saying is, if anybody has concerns in relation to their individual case, that I am giving a guarantee that their case or cases will be immediately drawn to the attention of the Adoption Board and if there are any concerns emerging from an examination of that case that warrants referral to the gardaí, to the General Register Office or any other statutory body that will happen as a matter of priority," he said.

Mr Shannon said he would recommend to the Adoption Board to de-register agencies engaged in wrongdoing.

"We will do what we can do within the powers laid down in the Adoption Acts. We will have much greater enhanced powers under the forthcoming adoption legislation and hopefully we will be in a better position to provide answers.

"The board has at its disposal the power to de-register an adoption society... it would be my recommendation to the board where wrongdoing has been found on the part of an adoption society, that the board... de-register the adoption society," he said.

Selasa, 18 Mei 2010

Indian Government involved in Adoption Crimes

European Foundation ACT in cooperation with ADVAIT Foundation and Sakhee pursuing cases of Childtrafficking for Intercountry adoption where countries like the Netherlands, Danmark, Belgium, Canada, The US and Australia where involved. But the international community sheers in silence.
Maharashtra officials linked to adoption scam: CBI

Aditya Kaul / DNA

Tuesday, May 18, 2010 0:31 IST






New Delhi: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) suspects the connivance of government officials with a Pune-based foundation in a racket involving the kidnapping of children of poor families and putting them up for adoption. The agency has booked Joginder Singh Bhasin, managing trustee of the Balwant Kartaar Foundation, also known as Preet Mandir, in this connection.

The CBI, in its FIR against the managing trustee and others, has alleged that between 2002 and 2010, Bhasin and associates kidnapped children belonging to poor families in Maharashtra under a criminal conspiracy.

Preet Mandir has rebutted the allegation and said all its adoption cases followed a judicial process. The CBI’s statement said: “He (Bhasin) used to send the children for inter-country adoption and extorted huge amounts of money from the adopting parents…Plus, he was also into illegal trafficking of children. For this purpose, he had opened a rehabilitation centre at Kanhe Phata,” it added.

The agency filed the FIR after being directed by the Mumbai high court to do so.

Maintaining that the racket could not have thrived for so long without the active support of officials of the state government, the CBI said: “Some officials of the Maharashtra government connived with Bhasin. He managed to traffic children to his rehabilitation centre Kanhe Phata in Pune in violation of existing norms.”

Preliminary investigations have found that Bhasin extorted money from Indian parents. “The amount prescribed in adoptions is Rs25,200 per case. In as many as 70 instances between 2005 to 2010, he charged money in excess of Rs50,000,” the statement added.

Evidence has also emerged that he had misappropriated nearly Rs26 lakh from the Balwant Kartaar foundation during 2002 to 2007 by using his personal credit card. “He also used to fraudulently procure rejection slips of Indian parents with a motive to use them to send children for foreign adoptions,” CBI release stated.

The CBI’s case is the outcome of criminal writ petitions filed by NGO’s Advait foundation and Sakhee in 2006 and 2007.
Reacting to the CBI’s charge, the agency’s spokesperson said adoptive parents were given children only after obtaining orders from the family court or the district court.

''Each and every child was admitted to Preet Mandir through judicial process and every child was given in adoption after completing all legal formalities as per the government’s Cara (Central Adoption Resource Authority) guidelines, the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, as well as Supreme Court directions,” he said. Preet Mandir has given more than 2,000 children in adoption in the past 33 years, he added.

With regards to the charge that the Kanhe Phata rehabilitation centre was opened for illegal activities, Preet Mandir said the centre was opened after obtaining the necessary licences from the state government and that it was closed after a damaging TV report in 2006.

Preet Mandir stressed that it was the CBI which twice in the past had given a clean chit to it in the same case.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_maharashtra-officials-linked-to-adoption-scam-cbi_1384343

read also:Case against Pune-based NGO official for child trafficking


Kamis, 13 Mei 2010

Special Needs Adoptions seems attractive - shorter waiting lists ?

Een gehandicapt kindje adopteer je sneller

  • woensdag 12 mei 2010
  • Auteur: Eline Bergmans
Het aantal adoptiekinderen met een handicap neemt de jongste jaren toe. Een zogenaamd 'special needs'-kindje is vaak de enige manier voor ouders om niet ellenlang op een wachtlijst te belanden.

In Nederland heeft al meer dan de helft van de adoptiekinderen een medische aandoening. De vereniging Wereldkinderen verwacht dat over vijf à tien jaar alleen nog maar special needs-kinderen ter adoptie naar Nederland zullen komen. In België loopt het niet zo'n vaart, maar toch.

Wachttijd: vier jaar

Dat er meer kinderen met een aandoening geadopteerd worden heeft onrechtstreeks te maken met het Haags Adoptieverdrag dat in 1995 in werking trad. Dat verdrag zegt dat kinderen alleen door buitenlandse ouders mogen geadopteerd worden als ze niet bij hun biologische familie kunnen opgroeien en als er geen adoptie- of stabiel pleeggezin in eigen land gevonden kan worden. 'Gevolg is dat er sindsdien veel minder kinderen interlandelijk worden toegewezen,' zegt Inge Demol van de Vereniging voor Kind en Adoptiegezin, VAG. 'De wachttijd voor een buitenlandse adoptie bedraagt vandaag gemiddeld zo'n vier jaar.'

'Voor de jonge en gezonde kinderen wordt gemakkelijker een gezin in eigen land gevonden,' bevestigt Dorine Chamon, de Vlaamse adoptieambtenaar. 'Voor de oudere kinderen en ook de kinderen met speciale noden is het vaak noodzakelijk om internationale adoptiemogelijkheden te onderzoeken.' Sinds 2009 zijn er ook speciale lijsten met special needs-kinderen.

Adoptieorganisatie Ray of Hope werkt bijvoorbeeld met China, dat zo'n aparte lijst hanteert. 'Voor alle duidelijkheid: het herkomstland zelf bepaalt die werkwijze ,' zegt Fien De Coene, coördinator van Ray of Hope. 'Maar het klopt dat de wachttijd voor deze kinderen duidelijk korter is.'

Verwachtingen bijstellen

De kortere wachttijd kan nooit de enige motivatie van kandidaat-adoptiefouders zijn. Daar wordt grondig op gescreend. 'Toch kan ik me voorstellen dat kandidaat-ouders verleid kunnen worden door die kortere wachttijd,' zegt Inge Demol van VAG. 'Vaak is het zo dat mensen beginnen aan de procedure met bepaalde verwachtingen, maar dat die in de loop van de tijd bijgesteld worden. Misschien willen ze in eerste instantie een gezond kind, maar bedenken ze later dat die special needs-kinderen hun zorg misschien meer nodig hebben. Het is wel belangrijk dat ze goed geïnformeerd worden over de zorgen die de kindjes vragen. Want ik vrees dat sommige ouders dat op voorhand niet goed inschatten.'

Lees ook

Minggu, 09 Mei 2010

Girl from Cameroon illegally taken for adoption 11 years ago still waits for her status


Kameroens meisje wachtte elf jaar op haar adoptie


Mijn adoptie-ouders dienden een adoptie aanvraag in bij de notaris, maar kregen daar geen antwoord. Ze doen ook geen moeite meer om me te adopteren of om ervoor te zorgen dat ik papieren krijg.
04-04-2010 | StampMedia - Lisa A. May
Dagelijks komen mensen naar België om een betere toekomst te zoeken. Velen komen vrijwillig, anderen worden gedwongen en sommige worden voorgelogen. Dorothea verbleef 11 jaar van haar jeugd illegaal in ons land. Haar adoptieouders kenden de procedures niet.

Dagelijks komen mensen naar België om een betere toekomst te zoeken. Velen komen vrijwillig, anderen worden gedwongen en sommige worden voorgelogen. Dorothea verbleef 11 jaar van haar jeugd illegaal in ons land. Haar adoptieouders kenden de procedures niet.

Dorothea Onango (17)* kwam op haar zesde verjaardag naar België. Haar werd gezegd dat ze op vakantie kwam. Maar eens in België vernam ze dat ze niet meer terug naar Kameroen kon. De zakenpartners van haar vader zouden haar adopteren.

Het verhaal van Dorothea

Dorothea: “Ik zei daag tegen mijn ouders, stapte in het vliegtuig en kwam naar België met meneer Claessen, zakenpartner van mijn vader. Mijn moeder wilde niet dat ik wegging, maar ze had geen keuze want vrouwen hebben in Afrika niets te zeggen.”

“Ik was nooit een kind dat zijn gevoelens toonde,” vertelt Dorothea verder. “Als je in Kameroen weende, was je zwak. Ik heb niet gehuild toen ik vertrok. Maar ik was heel bang. Ik ben naar België gekomen met een vreemde die er wit uit zag. Ik wilde mijn familie niet achter laten, maar aan de andere kant was ik zeer benieuwd naar de wilde verhalen die ik over het westen had gehoord.”

Eenmaal in België kreeg Dorothea te horen dat ze niet meer terugging naar Kameroen. Ze kreeg te horen dat haar ouders het moeilijk hadden, financieel en met elkaar. Ze ging dus geadopteerd worden door meneer en mevrouw Claessen.

“Mijn moeder werkte niet en mijn vader had het financieel niet makkelijk wat onze leven in Kameroen extra moeilijk maakte. Maar er was een groter probleem: mijn vader was verliefd op een andere vrouw en ging dus weg bij mijn moeder. Daarom moest ik weg, het was om mij te beschermen.”

Afstandelijk

“Wat me echt verbaasde toen ik hier aankwam, waren de vele winkels hier in België”, zegt Dorothea. “Maar ik voelde me zo vreselijk alleen. Ik begreep maar niet waarom mensen hier zo afstandelijk waren, waarom iedereen het zo druk had en waarom mensen zich zo versnelden om ergens te geraken. Dagen werden weken, weken werden maanden. Het werd hier koud en ik miste mijn ouders en broer vreselijk.”

Op school hier in België werd Dorothea gepest en gediscrimineerd. “Mijn echte vader is zwart, mijn moeder mulat. Ik ben licht gekleurd, heb kroeshaar en groene ogen. Ik hoor nergens bij.” In Kameroen was ze een blanke maar in België is ze “maar een bruine”. Kinderen lachten haar uit, trokken aan haar haren en betastten haar huid.

Illegaal

“Mijn adoptie-ouders dienden een adoptie aanvraag in bij de notaris, maar kregen daar geen antwoord”, vertelt Dorothea. “Ze doen ook geen moeite meer om me te adopteren of om ervoor te zorgen dat ik papieren krijg.”

Volgens René Naegels, Dorothea’s voogd, is het de schuld van de notaris dat het zover is gekomen. “Meneer en mevrouw Claessens zijn onwetend. De notaris had ze moeten zeggen waar ze moesten zijn en wat ze moesten doen.”

Vijf jaar

Via de voogd heeft Dorothea nu een verblijfvergunning van 5 jaar. Ze blijft Kameroense maar mag voorlopig in België wonen. Ze moest wel voldoen aan bepaalde eisen zoals bewijzen dat ze geïntegreerd was en goede punten haalde op school. Ook moest ze aantonen dat ze over stabiele bestaansmiddelen beschikte.

“Niet moeilijk want ik ga al meer dan tien jaar naar school hier in België”, zegt Dorothea. Maar was die hele procedure wel nodig? Kon ze niet geregulariseerd worden op grond van humanitaire redenen aangezien ze zoveel heeft mee gemaakt? Naegels: “Dit is een vraag die je aan een minister moet stellen, ik maak de weten niet.”

De Vlaamse Centrale Autoriteit Adoptie laat op onze vraag weten dat een eventuele regularisatie van Dorothea ondertussen de verantwoordelijkheid is van de Dienst Vreemdelingenzaken.

* Op vraag van Dorothea werden haar naam en die van haar adoptieouders veranderd.

© 2010 – StampMedia – Lisa A. May

Senin, 03 Mei 2010

CHINESE ADOPTEE GATHERING

Chinese Adult Adoptee Worldwide Reunion

We are a group of adult Hong Kong and Chinese adoptees and orphans here to support and to enjoy getting to know each other from the same homeland, to build ties with those who stayed home, and to keep ties with one another as older mentors for younger Chinese adoptees worldwide (see Chinese Adoptee Links). In future years, we hope other adult Chinese adoptees and orphans will join us to celebrate their future journeys home or to learn more about their experiences in their countries in the Pacific Rim/Southeast Asia.

We are planning our first adoptee reunion in Hong Kong this year, with the sole goal of bringing our sisters and brothers together in the place of our birth so that we can, as a group, share stories, bond, support, experience our birth city and cultures. As a Hong Kong Planning Committee, we have been very successful in linking with the local Hong Kong communities, for better cultural understandings, insight into our pasts and just a wonderful way to make friends with others with similiar backgrounds.

Our reunion dates and venue is set (with extra rooms to enable those who want their own mini-reunion because you’re from the same orphanage/sisterhood or even a member of the same global adoptee group). While we are starting to surge forward with the planning, adoptees from around the globe are linking with each other, organising themselves in their local community/country to see what we can do in spreading the word in order to help create what we believe would be an amazing experience. If you can help us spread the word through distributing our poster, we welcome your support.

Please feel free to explore the site and see how the reunion is developing, especially in Reunion Info Page. Even if you don’t think you will be able to join this reunion this year, we would still love to hear from you. Consider being part of our virtual Planning Committee, and maybe you can host a future gathering in your home country in the future?

First Chinese Adult Adoptee Worldwide Reunion 2010, Hong Kong

Theme: Journey Through Adoption

Tuesday, September 28 to Saturday, October 2, 2010

TO REGISTER

1. R.S.V.P. to attend in Facebook.

2. Download a Registration Form from the bottom of Reunion Info page, fully complete it and submit it to MailGuard('info','caawr.com') info@caawr.com by May 31 2010.

3. Join our CAAWR Facebook page for updates and keep in touch with each other for the future.